Smartphones: Where PCIe has not gone before—but will. Sooner rather than later.

Rick Merritt has just published an interesting article in EETimes: the PCI Special Interest Group (PCI SIG) expects to announce an adaptation of the ever-popular PCIe interface for mobile devices including smartphones. Merritt reports that the PCI SIG and MIPI Alliance signed a collaboration agreement on Monday, September 10 to create a version of the next-generation PCIe 4.0 spec that runs on top of the MIPI Alliance’s M-PHY. The MIPI Alliance, which oversees the development and adoption of mobile interface standard, and are there ever a lot of such standards, as you can see here from the MIPI Alliance’s Web site:

MIPI Interface Block Diagram for Mobile Devices

If you look at the diagram, you might see a glaring omission as I did. There’s no MIPI standard for connecting large amounts of RAM to the host application processor. To date, LPDDR standards have done this job and may continue to do so in the future. The addition of a PCIe protocol on top of the existing M-PHY physical layer presents another interesting possibility for a low-power interconnect spec. The MIPI Alliance’s M-PHY started as a 1.25Gbits/sec physical-layer interface and will reportedly hit 5.8Gbits/sec with a third-generation spec expected to appear next year.

About these ads

About sleibson2

EDA360 Evangelist and Marketing Director at Cadence Design Systems (blog at http://eda360insider.wordpress.com/)
This entry was posted in EDA360, IP, Mobile, SoC Realization, System Realization and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Smartphones: Where PCIe has not gone before—but will. Sooner rather than later.

  1. Erdem Karaadam says:

    Hi Steve,

    the 5.8Gbps M-PHY spec is already out there, isn’t it (HS-G3)? Would you possibly mean a new 10.6Gbps set of spec, like HS-G4 is expected to appear next year?

    Erdem

    • sleibson2 says:

      Sorry Erdem, I was going by Rick Merritt’s new article in EETimes. It specifically states something other that what you write. I’m not able to verify either way from the MIPI Alliance’s Web site. Perhaps you are referring to a draft spec?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s